Mengxi Wei

With the continuous diversification and innovation of educational operation modes, multiple stakeholders including schools, teachers, students, parents, and educational enterprises have deeply participated in various educational activities, bringing about increasingly prominent and diversified criminal risks. Based on the Risk Society Theory, Criminal Compliance Theory, and Multi-center Governance Theory, this study adopts a combination of empirical statistical data and typical judicial cases to systematically investigate the current status of multi-subject participation in the modern education industry. It systematically identifies major criminal risk categories in the educational field, including education and training fraud, citizen personal information infringement, illegal enrollment, and duty-related crimes, and further explores the internal logical relationship between multi-subject behavioral characteristics and criminal risk generation. The results reveal that lagging legal norms, decentralized subject responsibilities, insufficient cross-departmental regulatory coordination, and inadequate technical defense capabilities are the core driving factors of criminal risks in the education industry. The current industrial risk prevention system suffers from incomplete legal coverage, inefficient organizational collaboration, and backward technical prevention and control capabilities. In response to the above deficiencies, this study proposes optimized governance strategies from four dimensions: standardized criminal compliance system construction, collaborative cross-departmental supervision, intelligent technology empowerment, and universal legal education. The research aims to construct a multi-subject linkage prevention and control system for educational criminal risks, so as to promote the standardized, legalized, and high-quality development of the modern education industry.

Education Industry; Multi-subject Participation; Criminal Risk; Risk Prevention; Collaborative Governance

[1] Zhang Y,Zhu X Y.Logical Framework and Practical Approach of Risk Prevention and Control of"Civil-to-Criminal"Cases from the Perspective of Preventive Justice[J].Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators,2025,38(02):83-87. [2] Wang L M."Parallel Application of Criminal and Civil Law":The Basic Principle for Resolving Cross Cases of Criminal and Civil Law[J].Chinese Journal of Criminal Law,2024(02):18-33. [3] Zhang B.Dual Causality and Binary Criteria:The In-depth Jurisprudence of Handling Principles for Cross Cases of Criminal and Civil Law[J].Journal of Southwest Minzu University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2024,45(09):42-53. [4] Chen H.Research on Litigation Issues of Cross Cases of Criminal and Civil Law[D].Supervisor:Tang L.Southwest University of Political Science and Law,2022. [5] Wu Y M.Research on Litigation Mode of Cross Cases of Criminal and Civil Law[D].Supervisor:Xiao B S,Liang F.Tiangong University,2025. [6] Liu S F.Reflection and Reconstruction of Litigation Mode for Cross Cases of Criminal and Civil Law[D].Supervisor:Wu G H.Guangxi Minzu University,2023. [7] Research Group of Huzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province.Research on Prevention Mechanism and Governance Path of"Civil-to-Criminal"Cases[J].People’s Judicature,2023(25):112.

点击下载PDF