脓毒性休克患者容量评估方法的研究进展

ISSN:2705-098X(P)

EISSN:2705-0505(O)

语言:中文

作者
梁莎莎,马春剑
文章摘要
脓毒性休克是重症医学领域面临的严峻挑战之一,准确的容量评估对于指导治疗和改善患者预后至关重要。本文主要以脓毒性休克患者容量评估的方法进行阐述,结合其原理、优缺点和临床应用现状进行研究综述,为临床应用提供更可靠的参考依据。
文章关键词
脓毒性休克;容量评估;血流动力学;研究进展
参考文献
[1] Sakr,Y.,et al.,Sepsis and organ system failure are major determinants of post-intensive care unit mortality.J Crit Care, 2008.23(4):p.475-83. [2] Scheeren,T.and M.Ramsay,New Developments in Hemodynamic Monitoring.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2019.33 Suppl 1:p.S67-S72. [3] 黄瑞瑜等,脓毒性休克液体复苏与监测的研究进展.安徽医药,2018.22(06):第1007-1010页. [4] 高辉等,脓毒性休克初始液体复苏治疗现状及疾病预后影响因素研究进展.中外医疗,2024.43(15):第190-193页. [5] Dellinger,R.P.,Cardiovascular management of septic shock.Crit Care Med,2003.31(3):p.946-55. [6] Evans,L.,et al.,Surviving sepsis campaign:international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.Intensive Care Med, 2021.47(11):p.1181-1247. [7] Marik,P.E.,M.Baram and B.Vahid,Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness?A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.Chest,2008.134(1):p.172-8. [8] Eskesen,T.G.,M.Wetterslev and A.Perner,Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.Intensive Care Med,2016.42(3):p.324-332. [9] Davis,A.L.,et al.,American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock.Crit Care Med,2017.45(6):p.1061-1093. [10] Rivers,E.,et al.,Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.N Engl J Med,2001.345(19):p.1368-77. [11] Antonini,M.,et al.,[The PiCCO system with brachial-axillary artery access in hemodynamic monitoring during surgery of abdominal aortic aneurysm].Minerva Anestesiol,2001.67(6):p.447-56. [12] Weiss,S.L.,et al.,Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children.Pediatr Crit Care Med,2020. 21(2):p.e52-e106. [13] Deep,A.,et al.,Evolution of haemodynamics and outcome of fluid-refractory septic shock in children.Intensive Care Med, 2013.39(9):p.1602-9. [14] Rhodes,A.,et al.,Surviving Sepsis Campaign:International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock:2016.Crit Care Med, 2017.45(3):p.486-552. [15] Monnet,X.,et al.,Assessing pulmonary permeability by transpulmonary thermodilution allows differentiation of hydrostatic pulmonary edema from ALI/ARDS.Intensive Care Med,2007.33(3):p.448-53. [16] Lubrano,R.,et al.,Prognostic value of extravascular lung water index in critically ill children with acute respiratory failure.Intensive Care Med,2011.37(1):p.124-31. [17] Kaptein,M.J.and E.M.Kaptein,Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index:Clinical Validation and Application for Assessment of Relative Intravascular Volume.Adv Chronic Kidney Dis,2021.28(3):p.218-226. [18] Xiong,Z.,et al.,Predictive Value of the Respiratory Variation in Inferior Vena Cava Diameter for Ventilated Children With Septic Shock. Front Pediatr,2022.10:p.895651. [19] Orso,D.,et al.,Accuracy of Ultrasonographic Measurements of Inferior Vena Cava to Determine Fluid Responsiveness:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Intensive Care Med,2020.35(4):p.354-363. [20] Singla,D.,et al.,Role of carotid corrected flow time and peak velocity variation in predicting fluid responsiveness:a systematic review and meta-analysis.Korean J Anesthesiol,2023.76(3):p.183-193. [21] Desgranges,F.P.,et al.,Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow peak velocity to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children:a systematic review and metaanalysis. Paediatr Anaesth,2016.26(1):p.37-47. [22] Shen,J.,et al.,Corrected flow time and respirophasic variation in blood flow peak velocity of radial artery predict fluid responsiveness in gynecological surgical patients with mechanical ventilation.BMC Anesthesiol,2022.22(1):p.299.
Full Text:
DOI